• English
    • العربية
  • English 
    • English
    • العربية
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Faculty of Oral & Dental Medicine
  • Theses and Dissertations
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Faculty of Oral & Dental Medicine
  • Theses and Dissertations
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Two Different Monolithic Materials after Chewing Simulation

Thumbnail
View/Open
Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Two Different Monolithic Materials after Chewing Simulation .pdf (1.865Mb)
Date
2018
Author
Mahmoud, Wafaa Mahmoud Hamed
Hussein, Eman Mohamed Anwar "Supervisor"
Amin, Rania Adel "Supervisor"
Aboushahba, Mostafa ElSayed "Supervisor"
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate weight loss, surface roughness and micro-hardness of two different monolithic materials (PICN and Lithium disilicate) after thermo-mechanical aging using chewing simulator. In this study, 6 blocks of each tested materials milled into cylinders using CAD/CAM system (CAM 5-S1 impression). Each cylinder were cut into discs (10mm X 2mm) using microtome. Samples were divided into two groups according to the material: ▪ Group (1) (n=14): Discs of PICN (polymer infiltrated ceramic network). ▪ Group (2) (n=14): Discs of Lithium disilicate Samples of each group were tested before chewing simulation for weight loss, surface roughness and micro-hardness. The samples were then inserted into the chewing simulator machine for wear test, each sample was opposed by a palatal cusp of upper first premolar. Samples were subjected to chewing simulation testing at a frequency of 60 cycle/min for (75,000 cycles) with a load of 5Kg (49 N) to test: 1- Weight loss: by measuring the difference in weight before and after chewing simulation by using an electrical balance. 2- Surface Roughness: by measuring the difference in sample surface roughness before and after chewing simulation by using 3D optical profilometry. 3- Micro-hardness: by measuring the difference in sample micro-hardness before and after chewing simulation by using Vickers hardness test. After chewing simulation; samples tested for weight loss, surface roughness and micro-hardness. From the results, it was found that: 1) PICN had higher mean weight loss than Lithium disilicate after chewing simulation. 2) PICN had higher mean surface roughness value than Lithium disilicate after chewing simulation. 3) Lithium disilicate had higher mean micro- hardness values than PICN after chewing simulation.
URI
http://dspace.fue.edu.eg/xmlui/handle/123456789/4893
Collections
  • Theses and Dissertations [29]

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
All rights reserved to 
Atmire NV
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
All rights reserved to 
Atmire NV